000			03520nab a2200469 i 4500
001			ELB143950
003			FINmELB
005			20250326035505.0
006			m o u
007			cr cn|||||||||
008			230522c20209999sp tr p o 0 0eng d
022			_a1132-0559
035			_a(OCoLC)1385417737
040			_aFINmELB _bspa _erda _cFINmELB
050		4	_aHM251 _b.A734 2020
080			_a316.6
082	0	4	_a302 _223
100	1		_aArce, Ramón, _eautor.
245	1	0	_aAre interventions with batterers effective? A meta-analytical review / _cRamón Arce, Esther Arias, Mercedes Novo, and Francisca Fariña.
264		1	_a[Madrid] : _bColegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid, _c2020.
310			_aCuatrimestral
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent/spa
337			_acomputadora _bc _2rdamedia/spa
338			_arecurso en línea _bcr _2rdacarrier/spa
520			_aThe inconsistency in the results both internally and between of previous meta-analyses on batterer intervention program efficacy, and the publication of new batterer interventions underscored the need for an up-to-date meta-analytical review. A total of 25 primary studies were found from literature search, obtaining 62 effect sizes, and a total sample of 20,860 intervened batterers. The results of a global meta-analysis showed a positive, significant, and of a medium magnitude effect size for batterer interventions, but not generalizable. Nevertheless, the results exhibited a significantly higher rate of recidivism measured in couple reports (CRs) than in official records (ORs). As a consequence, intervention efficacy measuring in CRs was null, whilst in ORs was positive and significant. As for the intervention model, positive and significant effects were observed under the Duluth Model and cognitive-behavioural treatment programs (CBTPs), but a higher effect size was obtained with CBTPs in comparison to the Duluth Model (under this model, interventions may have negative effects, i.e., an increase in recidivism rate). In relation to intervention length, short interventions failed to reduce recidivism in ORs and may have negative effects, while long interventions were effective in reducing recidivism rate in ORs without negative effects. Efficacy evaluations in short follow-ups were invalid as artificially boosted recidivism reduction rate. Limitations of ORs and short follow-ups as measures of the intervention efficacy and implications of results for batterer intervention are discussed.
588			_aDescripción basada en Psychosocial Intervention, vol. 29, núm. 3 (september 2020), P. 153-164.
588			_aDescripción basada en metadatos suministrados por el editor y otras fuentes.
590			_aRecurso electrónico. Santa Fe, Arg.: elibro, 2023. Disponible vía World Wide Web. El acceso puede estar limitado para las bibliotecas afiliadas a elibro.
650		4	_aEvaluación de la intervención.
650		4	_aInformes de las parejas.
650		4	_aMaltratador.
650		4	_aModelo Duluth.
650		4	_aProgramas de tratamiento cognitivo-conductuales.
650		4	_aRegistros oficiales.
655		4	_aArtículos.
700	1		_aArias, Esther, _eautor.
700	1		_aNovo, Mercedes, _eautor.
700	1		_aFariña, Francisca, _eautor.
773	1		_tPsychosocial Intervention. _xISSN1132-0559 _dMadrid : Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid. _gvol. 29, núm. 3 (september 2020), p. 153-164
797	2		_aelibro, Corp.
856	4	0	_uhttps://elibro.net/ereader/usam/143950
999			_c77176 _d77176